A report by FASCISMWATCH with the help of A.I.
Introduction: The Contested Ancestry and the Clash of Sovereignty
The Four Corners region of the American Southwest is the focus of a severe ethnohistorical and political conflict between the Pueblo peoples and the Diné (Navajo) Nation. This dispute is a battle over the narrative of the past and sovereignty over the present, fundamentally impacting land stewardship, religious rights, and cultural integrity. This conflict is not merely academic; it is a live-action political struggle over scarce resources and legal precedence that has intensified due to the accelerating pressures of climate change and the political realignment of the Diné Nation's leadership with a deregulatory, resource-extraction agenda.
At the core is the Diné traditional narrative, which asserts that the Ancestral Puebloans—referred to derogatorily as the Anaasází ("Ancient Enemy") (133)—were a failed, corrupt society that was destroyed and left no direct modern lineage (1, 2). This claim is demonstrably unfactual when measured against an overwhelming body of archaeological, genetic, and historical evidence that supports the unbroken continuity of the Pueblo peoples (3, 4).
The aggressive use of this denialist narrative in modern political and legal arenas, such as the fight over the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and contentious land-use policies spanning the Trump and Biden administrations, constitutes a profound challenge to Pueblo sovereignty. Pueblo leaders view this as a clear-cut attempt at cultural erasure—an effort to seize historical legitimacy by invalidating the existence of their neighbors' continuous heritage. This report details the factual evidence, dissects the fallacies inherent in the Diné counter-narrative, and analyzes the high-stakes political and legal consequences of this ongoing conflict, with a specific focus on the alignment of the Diné Nation’s economic interests under President Buu Nygren with the MAGA deregulatory agenda. The subsequent sections detail the historical divergence, the scientific proofs of lineage, the political use of the denialist narrative, the shared trauma of the slave trade, the legal conflicts over cultural and physical resources, and the contemporary political calculations driving this ethnohistorical war.
I. Comparative Ethnohistory of the Southwest: Pueblo vs. Athabascan Timeline
The historical record of the American Southwest is defined by two major populations: the Pueblo peoples, who are the ancient, sedentary, agricultural inhabitants, and the Athabascan-speaking groups (Diné/Navajo and Apache), who are later migrant, mobile groups. Their simultaneous history of interaction, conflict, and cultural borrowing forms the foundation of the current dispute (5).
1. The Pueblo Chronology: Sedentary Antiquity and Organized Resistance
The history of the Pueblo peoples is one of continuous cultural evolution in place, marked by sophisticated architecture, trade, and organized resistance (6, 5). Their ancient legacy began with the Basketmaker Periods (c. 1500 BCE – 750 CE), which saw the transition to settled life and the crucial development of pithouses, the direct architectural predecessors of the modern kiva (7). This was followed by the Chaco Canyon Zenith (c. 900 CE – 1150 CE), which represented the apex of Ancestral Puebloan society through the engineering of Great Houses (like Pueblo Bonito) and vast regional road networks (9, 11). The subsequent population movements were not a disappearance but a widespread shift known as the Great Migration (1150 CE – 1300 CE), a systemic, multi-generational movement due to drought and environmental stress that led directly to the founding of modern Pueblo villages (12, 13).
The colonial period tested their resilience. The first major Spanish intrusion was the Coronado Expedition (1540), which included the Tiguex War where the Tiwa Pueblos resisted the Spanish advance (5). Colonization began in earnest with Juan de Oñate (1598), who introduced the brutal systems of forced labor and slavery (14, 15). This oppression culminated in the horrific Battle of Acoma (1599), setting a precedent for Spanish violence (15). Ultimately, the Pueblo peoples unified under leaders like Popé of Ohkay Owingeh to launch the Pueblo Revolt of 1680, the only successful Native uprising against a colonizing power in North America, driving the Spanish out of New Mexico for twelve years (22, 23, 16). The organizational complexity and pan-Pueblo coordination required to achieve the 1680 revolt is further proof of the highly structured and stable nature of their society, directly contradicting the Diné narrative of the ancient people being disorganized and easily destroyed (24, 25).
2. The Diné/Athabascan Chronology: Migration, Integration, and Conquest
The ancestors of the Navajo (Diné) and Apache are Athabascan-speaking peoples who migrated from present-day Canada, arriving in the Southwest between 1100 CE and 1500 CE (17, 18). They were initially mobile hunter-gatherers, but Spanish records from the Late 1500s begin to distinguish the Diné from other groups by their notable adoption of agriculture learned from their Pueblo neighbors (19). A critical period of Pueblo-Diné intermixing occurred after the Spanish Re-conquest in 1692, as Pueblo refugees sought protection among the Diné, leading to the adoption of new Diné clans and the construction of defensive, multi-room masonry structures known as pueblitos (Early 1700s) (26, 19, 27). The construction of these pueblitos is a physical, archaeological testament to the influence of Pueblo architectural and defensive knowledge being rapidly integrated into Diné culture (28, 29).
The Diné later faced their own devastating conquest by the U.S. military. In 1864, U.S. forces, led by Colonel Kit Carson, implemented a brutal scorched-earth campaign that forced the surrender of the Diné. This resulted in The Long Walk, a forced march of over 8,000 Diné to the Bosque Redondo internment camp at Fort Sumner (20, 21). After four years of devastating internment, the Diné secured their release and homeland through the Treaty of Bosque Redondo (1868), negotiated by leaders including Barboncito (20, 27). This comparative history clearly establishes that the Diné Nation is a later migrant group whose culture was fundamentally shaped by the Pueblo peoples after the Pueblo Revolt, undermining any claim that the ancient culture vanished and flows only through the Diné narrative (4, 26).
II. The Factual Lineage: Unbroken Pueblo Continuity and the Historical Record
The established historical, archaeological, and genetic record overwhelmingly supports the lineage of the modern Pueblo peoples as the direct cultural and genetic descendants of the ancient civilization known as the Ancestral Puebloans (5). The term "Ancestral Puebloans" is now the ethically and institutionally preferred term, rigorously replacing the pejorative Diné term, "Anasazi" (5, 6).
1. The Detailed Archaeological Timeline of Unbroken Settlement and Migration
The Ancestral Puebloan culture represents a dynamic, continuous cultural evolution spanning over two millennia, firmly establishing their residency prior to the arrival of the Athabascan-speaking Diné group:
Basketmaker Periods (c. 1500 BCE – 750 CE): Focused on semi-subterranean pithouses and the development of early agriculture, laying the groundwork for sedentary life (7, 8).
Chaco Canyon Zenith (c. 900 CE – 1150 CE): Characterized by massive, multi-story masonry structures (Great Houses) and a complex regional trade and ceremonial network, showing high social organization (9, 10, 11).
Mesa Verde Occupancy and The Great Migration (c. 1150 CE – 1300 CE): The famed cliff dwellings represent the final phase of ancient settlement before the widespread, strategic movement southward and eastward, not a disappearance, but a directed re-aggregation (12, 10, 13).
Pueblo IV Period (c. 1300 CE – 1600 CE): Marked by the emergence of the large, aggregated villages (e.g., Hopi, Zuni, Rio Grande Pueblos) found at the time of Spanish contact. This period is the direct link between the ancient Chaco/Mesa Verde sites and the modern Pueblos (12, 13, 30, 31). The ceramic traditions, such as the distinct designs of Pueblo IV pottery, show a clear and unbroken stylistic continuity with those found in the preceding periods, demonstrating direct artistic and cultural transmission (30).
2. Scientific and Cultural Proof of Lineage
The claim of unbroken Pueblo lineage is verified by multiple, independent lines of evidence that critically undermine the Diné narrative:
Genetic Evidence (3, 4): Modern studies using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) demonstrate a direct genetic link between ancient Chaco Canyon burials and modern Pueblo populations, particularly the Tewa and Tiwa speakers (e.g., Picuris Pueblo). This genetic continuity conclusively refutes the notion that the ancient people were eradicated or vanished.
Architectural and Ceremonial Continuity (5, 32): The ceremonial subterranean structure known as the kiva—developed from the early pithouse—remains the central architectural and ceremonial feature in all modern Pueblos. The evolution of masonry construction, irrigation techniques, and the spatial layout of villages show a linear, adapted progression over centuries.
Linguistic Disparity (13, 33, 34): The Pueblo peoples speak languages from several distinct, ancient language families (Kiowa-Tanoan, Keresan, Zunian, Uto-Aztecan) that have existed in the region for millennia. In contrast, the Diné language (Navajo) is an Athabascan language, linguistically related to groups in Alaska and Western Canada (33, 34). This fundamental linguistic difference is irrefutable proof that the Diné were a later migrant population and not the ancestral residents of the ancient settlements.
3. The Pueblo Revolt of 1680: The Apex of Resilience and Continuity
The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 stands as the definitive historical testament to Pueblo resilience and continuous identity.
Popé and the Unification (22, 23): The organized, secret planning led by Popé required the coordination of dozens of independent, linguistically diverse villages across a vast territory—an act of unified political will that directly demonstrates the functional sovereignty and established institutions of the Pueblo nations at the time of Spanish re-contact.
Refugee Flight and Diné Incorporation (26, 35): Following the Spanish Re-conquest in 1692, thousands of Pueblo people fled into the Diné Dinetah region. Their subsequent incorporation was not a conquest or absorption of scattered remnants, but the addition of large, organized refugee populations, whose cultural practices (weaving, pottery, agriculture, and masonry—the pueblitos) were adopted by the Diné, cementing the Pueblo cultural primacy in the post-Revolt Southwest (26, 36).
III. The Unfactual Diné Counter-Narrative: Political Motive and Cultural Denialism
The traditional Diné (Navajo) narrative is a politically charged account based on a scientifically unsubstantiated claim of cultural destruction, intentionally designed to create a gap in the Pueblo historical record that the Diné can claim to fill.
1. The False Narrative of Anaasází Destruction and Slavery
The core of the Diné traditional teaching is that the ancient people, the Anaasází, were a distinct group that was completely destroyed or caused their own downfall, leaving no direct modern lineage (1, 33). The derogatory term, meaning "Ancient Enemy" or "Alien Ancestor" is itself a linguistic mechanism of separation and denigration (6, 37, 133). The Indian Pueblo Cultural Center (IPCC) explicitly condemns the use of the term Anasazi, stating that Pueblo peoples "do not wish to refer to their ancestors in such a disrespectful manner," and that the name was deliberately applied by early Anglo-American archaeologists who understood the pejorative Diné meaning (134).
The Wally Brown Claims and the Gambler Story: Navajo elder Wally Brown is a key proponent of this denialist account, disseminating it through the popular platform "Navajo Traditional Teachings" (38, 135). Brown’s narrative is an intentional counter-argument to science, asserting that the catastrophic end of the ancient people was due to moral and religious failure (14, 39). The story of "The Gambler" is a central myth of this narrative:
The people of Chaco Canyon were "violent," "worshiped the darkness," and practiced "human sacrifice" (14, 39, 136).
The civilization was ended not by drought and migration, but by a divine judgment. A Navajo gambler, aided by the Holy People (Diné: Diyin Dinéʼe), defeats the deceitful
Anaasázígambler in a high-stakes game (40, 1).The victory results in the liberation of all the
Anaasázíslaves and the subsequent divine eradication of the civilization (1). The final leader is transformed into an arrow by the Holy People and shot into the southern sky (1).
The Intentional Erasure: By framing the ancient culture as morally corrupt and destroyed by divine intervention that included the liberation of their people, the narrative achieves two critical political goals: it justifies the Diné claim to the ancient sites and erases the continuous, factual Pueblo lineage, positioning the Diné as the moral and rightful inheritors (4, 26). This narrative shifts the focus from lineal descent (which the Pueblos possess) to moral ascendancy and spiritual stewardship (which the Diné claim through their tradition) (41).
2. The Politicization of Incorporation and Clan Formation
The Diné narrative claims they only incorporated the remnants of the ancient settlements—often described as slaves or subjects—into their society, forming several current Diné clans (42).
The Distortion of Refuge: While clans like Táchiiʼnii (Red Running into Water) and others contain ancestors of Pueblo origin, the archaeological record of the pueblitos (c. 1692-1750) and Spanish archives confirm that the integration involved large, intact groups of refugees from dozens of Pueblo villages, not merely captured individuals or slaves (26, 43). This massive, post-Revolt cultural exchange is distorted by the Diné narrative to suggest a position of superiority and moral reclamation rather than one of refuge and mutual cultural borrowing (44).
IV. The Brutality of the Genízaro Slave Trade: Shared Trauma and Divergent Narratives
The Spanish colonial era introduced a vast, brutal system of Native American slavery in the Southwest, formalized as the Genízaro system. This shared history of violence and captivity profoundly shaped both Diné and Pueblo identities, yet it is interpreted differently in the context of the Ancestral Puebloan debate (14, 45, 46).
1. Definition and Scale of the Genízaro System
Genízaros (heˈnēsǝrō) was the term used for detribalized Indigenous people in the Spanish colony of New Mexico from the 17th to 19th centuries (14).
The System of Ransom: The trade operated through a system where Indigenous captives (mostly children and women) were taken during raids by various groups (Ute, Comanche, Diné) and then "ransomed" or sold to Spanish colonists (14, 47). This transaction ostensibly converted them to Christianity, yet they remained in lifelong servitude as household or agricultural slaves (46).
Forced Labor and Assimilation: Genízaros were assimilated into the Hispanic socio-economic system, losing their original tribal identities. This system was vital to the Spanish colonial economy, supplying labor for everything from domestic work to ranching (45, 48).
Tribal Origins: The captives came from nearly every non-Pueblo tribe in the region, including the Diné, Ute, Comanche, and Apache, who were themselves also major participants in the capture and sale of others (49).
2. Diné and Pueblo Roles in the Slave Trade
The Genízaro system highlights the complexity of the historical relationships in the Southwest, particularly the role of both the Diné and Pueblo people in the violence (50).
Diné Participation: The Diné Nation was a major player in the slave trade, regularly raiding for captives to use as labor or to sell/trade to Spanish settlements. This raiding often included Pueblo groups after the 1692 Re-conquest, leading to deep, historical tensions (49, 50, 51, 137). The Diné narrative of liberating the
Anaasázíslaves through divine intervention is thus a severe historical contradiction, as the Diné were simultaneously engaging in the large-scale enslavement of their neighbors (52, 138).Pueblo Vulnerability: The Pueblo people were both targets of raids (especially by the Diné and Apache) and, less frequently, participants in the Spanish system of ransom. However, the Pueblos, as sedentary, Spanish-subject communities, were subject to constant colonial scrutiny and were perpetually vulnerable to raids from mobile groups (49).
3. The Modern Conflict’s Contradiction
The Genízaro history reveals a deep contradiction in the current ethnohistorical debate:
The Diné Narrative's Ethical Blind Spot: The insistence on the
Anaasázíslavery narrative as a justification for their historical legitimacy is ethically challenged by the documented historical fact of the Diné’s own active and extensive involvement in the Genízaro slave trade (49, 50). This manipulation of historical trauma is seen by Pueblo leaders as an attempt to project their own historical role as enslavers onto the ancient Pueblo people (53).Pueblo Continuity and Resilience: The Pueblo communities, despite the pressure of the Genízaro system, maintained their political and cultural integrity, unlike the detribalized Genízaros (47). This resilience reinforces the argument of unbroken continuity that the Diné narrative seeks to deny (26).
V. The High-Stakes Legal and Political Conflict: Denialism in Action
The disagreement has become a central struggle over resource control and legal rights, centered on the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990 (54) and the control of mineral resources in the Greater Chaco Region.
1. The NAGPRA Dispute and the Unjust Co-Affiliation
The NAGPRA act mandates the return of culturally affiliated human remains and sacred objects to lineal descendants or culturally affiliated tribes (54). This is the key legal battlefield for the ethnohistorical war.
The Federal Concession: Despite overwhelming scientific evidence of Pueblo continuity, the U.S. government ultimately granted ancestral affiliation to both the numerous Pueblo tribes and the Navajo Nation for remains at sites like Chaco Canyon (12, 55). This decision was based on a loose interpretation of "cultural affiliation" that considered the Navajo's "strong traditional attachment to the place" (55), a move that stunned the archaeological world and infuriated Pueblo leaders (136). The scientific consensus that the Athabascan ancestors of the Diné did not even arrive in the Four Corners region until the 1500s—300 years after Chaco was abandoned—makes the co-affiliation ruling scientifically indefensible (136).
Diné Legal Rationale for Co-Affiliation: The Diné Nation argues affiliation based on the concept of "shared geography" and "traditional cultural affiliation" under NAGPRA, which includes present-day land use and spiritual connection, not exclusively lineal descent (55, 101, 139). This legal argument relies heavily on the documented post-1692 refugee integration as the basis for cultural ties to the ancient sites and remains, thus legally justifying their claim without having to prove the scientific lineal descent that the Pueblos possess (26, 101). This is a deliberate legal maneuver to bypass the archaeological and genetic facts (3, 4). The Diné strategy is to prioritize the linguistic and clan-based oral history over the archaeological record to meet the lower standard of "cultural affiliation" rather than the higher one of "lineal descent" (102).
Pueblo Legal Counter-Attack: The All Pueblo Council of Governors (APCG) consistently combats this joint affiliation, arguing it is an institutional failure that empowers the Diné despite their factual discontinuity (32, 56). Their legal counter-intervention highlights that the Diné's reliance on "shared geography" is a clear attempt at a "land grab" and undermines the "lineal descent" priority that is explicitly detailed in NAGPRA's founding legislation (9, 54, 103). The Pueblos demand the legal superiority of direct, scientifically proven lineal descent over claims of spiritual or geographical proximity (3, 4, 103). The Pueblos’ position is that the law’s clear intent was to privilege the closest possible relationship—the lineal descendants—to the remains.
2. Historians and Scholars Condemning Diné Revisionism
A wide range of scholars and organizations have criticized the Diné historical revisionism used to justify their claims, pointing out its conflict with established ethnohistory and its political motivations:
Archaeological Condemnation: The archaeological community generally finds the Diné theory of descending from the Anaasází to be "incredibly unpopular" (136). The established theory—backed by linguistic and archaeological evidence—is that the Athabascan ancestors of the Diné arrived hundreds of years after the Ancestral Puebloans abandoned the Chaco and Mesa Verde sites (136).
Pueblo Cultural Center Stance: The Indian Pueblo Cultural Center (IPCC), representing the 19 Pueblos of New Mexico, has taken a firm, institutional stance against the use of the term "Anasazi," viewing it as a clear act of disrespect and cultural denigration of their ancestors (134). The IPCC uses this public education effort to combat the core assertion of the Diné narrative.
Historians on Oral Tradition: While modern historians (such as those represented by the American Historical Association) increasingly recognize the value of Native oral traditions to fill gaps in the written record, they maintain the need for critical analysis (140, 141). The Diné narrative of the Gambler and the eradication of a slave-owning society is viewed by many as a powerful origin myth that serves a political and moral function—to justify their current presence and authority—rather than an accurate historical account (41, 136).
3. The Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute (Healing v. Jones)
The conflict with the Hopi over land ownership and resource rights is a historically documented instance of the Diné Nation encroaching upon the smaller, more vulnerable Pueblo territories (142).
Encirclement and Expansion: The original 1882 Executive Order Reservation was set aside for the Hopi and "such other Indians as the Secretary of the Interior may see fit to settle thereon" (143). Over time, the massive expansion of the Navajo Reservation effectively encircled the Hopi reservation entirely (142).
The Healing v. Jones Decision (1962): The legal conflict culminated in the landmark case Healing v. Jones. The court decision ultimately held that, except for the exclusively Hopi Grazing District Six, the Hopi and Navajo Tribes had joint, undivided, and equal interests to the surface and subsurface resources of the shared area (143). This decision was rooted in the federal government’s desire to negotiate mineral leases, forcing the Hopi Tribal Council to be revived in the 1950s (143).
The 1974 Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act: This act led to the relocation of thousands of Diné people from lands partitioned exclusively to the Hopi (Hopi Partition Land, or HPL) (143). The history of this dispute is viewed by Pueblo leaders as a clear-cut example of the larger, more powerful Diné Nation aggressively challenging the sovereignty and territory of a smaller Pueblo neighbor (144).
VI. The Nygren Administration: The "MAGA Traitor" Alignment and Fossil Fuel Greed
Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren's administration (elected 2023) has been widely criticized by Diné environmentalists and progressives for strategically embracing the "energy dominance" agenda of the Trump administration. Critics argue this prioritization of short-term fossil fuel revenue and deregulation over cultural preservation and climate action constitutes a profound challenge to both Pueblo sovereignty (via the Chaco conflict) and a betrayal of the Diné Nation's traditional values and long-term well-being, earning him the moniker of a "MAGA traitor" (57, 58).
1. Public Endorsement of Trump's Pro-Coal Agenda
Nygren has publicly and repeatedly supported the Trump administration's efforts to revitalize the domestic coal industry (59, 60, 61).
Praise for Trump’s Coal Orders: Nygren has issued statements praising President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at reducing environmental regulations on coal-fired power plants, arguing these actions ensure the financial stability of the Navajo Transitional Energy Company (NTEC) (60, 62). He explicitly frames this alignment as a matter of economic self-determination and sovereign choice to utilize the Nation's own resources, regardless of the climate impact (63).
Diné Environmentalist Condemnation: Organizations like the Navajo grassroots group Diné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment (Diné CARE) have condemned Nygren’s pro-coal stance, pointing out that it directly contradicts the traditional Diné philosophical concept of Hózhó (harmony and balance) and perpetuates environmental injustice on the reservation (64, 65). This internal dissent highlights a massive ideological schism within the Nation.
2. The Chaco Canyon Conflict and Undermining Deb Haaland
Nygren's most direct political challenge to the Biden administration came over the Chaco Culture National Historical Park buffer zone, championed by Interior Secretary Deb Haaland (Pueblo of Laguna) (56, 66, 67).
The Five-Mile Compromise and the Lawsuit: Nygren opposed Haaland's 10-mile moratorium on new oil and gas leasing around the Chaco site, advocating instead for a 5-mile buffer zone (68, 69). He argued that the 10-mile zone severely impacts the property rights of Navajo allottees—individual Diné landowners whose sub-surface mineral rights would be effectively canceled—leading to lost royalties and financial hardship (68, 70). This argument is central to the lawsuit the Navajo Nation filed against the Department of the Interior in 2024 (71).
Sovereignty as Economic Necessity: Nygren strategically frames the opposition not as a defense of fossil fuels, but as a defense of Diné sovereignty against a paternalistic federal government that he claims ignored the Nation’s requests for meaningful consultation (68, 72). The implication is that Pueblo interests (represented by Haaland) were given precedence over Diné economic autonomy, forcing the Diné to align with deregulatory forces like the MAGA agenda to protect their immediate financial future (73).
Alignment with Trump and the Repeal Effort: The lawsuit and the rhetoric align perfectly with the goals of the oil and gas industry and the Trump/MAGA wing of the Republican Party, who seek to repeal the Chaco protection measures. Nygren’s stance provides powerful ammunition for external political forces seeking to maximize resource extraction across the Southwest (74).
3. The Ideological Irony: Honoring the Code Talkers While Erasing Their Legacy
The ultimate and most weirdly ironic contradiction of President Nygren's alignment with the Trump/MAGA agenda is the profound ideological hostility it exposes toward the Diné Nation's cultural integrity and historical dignity (75).
The Pocahontas Insult and the Indignity of Alignment: In November 2017, while being honored at the White House by President Trump, the Navajo Code Talkers were present when Trump used the occasion to launch a racist attack on Senator Elizabeth Warren, referring to her by the derogatory moniker "Pocahontas" (76). This moment crystallized the profound political indignity required by the transactional alliance.
The Code Talker Purge: In March 2025, the Trump administration undertook a systematic purge of references to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) from U.S. military websites and literature, during which information detailing the vital role of the Navajo Code Talkers was removed (100). This deliberate act of erasure from the military's history demonstrates the MAGA agenda's foundational contempt for minority contributions, yet Nygren continues the alliance (77).
A Betrayal That Endangers His People: The economic alignment risks trading the Nation's environmental and cultural future for short-term revenue, accepting a position that subjects the Diné to the very political forces that express contempt for their people and their history (75).
VII. The Environmental and Socio-Economic Conflict: Water, Climate, and Disease
The ethnohistorical conflict over ancestry is inextricably linked to the present-day battle over water rights and climate change adaptation—a fight where the Diné Nation's aggressive economic agenda often clashes with the fundamental survival interests of their Pueblo neighbors and their own people (78).
1. The Colorado River Crisis and Unsettled Water Rights
The Colorado River Basin is severely overallocated, and the decades-long megadrought has forced an existential reckoning among all users (79, 80). The allocation was fundamentally unfair from the start.
The 1922 Colorado River Compact Exclusion: The original 1922 Compact allocated water between the seven basin states without providing any specific allocation or representation for the over 30 federally recognized tribal nations whose reservations include the basin (104). This exclusion has led to nearly a century of litigation and conflict, as Indigenous nations seek to assert their rights under the Winters Doctrine (105).
The Winters Doctrine and Pueblo Priority: The Winters Doctrine (1908) holds that when the U.S. establishes a reservation, it implicitly reserves enough water to fulfill the reservation’s purposes (106). The Pueblos, whose ancient and continuous agricultural practices predate the United States and even Spanish colonization, possess water rights considered "prior and paramount"—often the oldest and strongest in the Southwest (107).
The Diné Water Rights Settlement: The Diné Nation has the largest single unsettled claim to the Colorado River and its tributaries, particularly the San Juan River (104, 108). President Nygren has prioritized settling these claims, such as the proposed Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act (2024), which would quantify rights to water from the Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers (109). While this settlement is vital for providing running water to the approximately one-third of Diné households that lack it, it is negotiated within a system of scarcity, potentially impacting the water available to their Pueblo and state neighbors in the Upper Basin (110).
Infrastructure Failure: The tragic irony is that even when water rights are settled, the lack of infrastructure—pipes, pumps, treatment plants—prevents access. The Diné Nation, despite potential legal rights to billions of gallons, struggles with development costs, forcing thousands to continue hauling water (109, 111). The political calculus behind Nygren’s pro-fossil fuel stance is partially driven by the desperate need for NTEC revenue to fund this essential water infrastructure (63).
2. Climate Change, Food Security, and Health Disparities
Climate change accelerates the water crisis and intensifies the resource conflict, disproportionately impacting the health and cultural integrity of both Indigenous communities (112).
Impact on Traditional Agriculture: Increased temperatures, decreased snowpack, and prolonged drought directly threaten the traditional dry-farming practices of the Hopi and the irrigated agriculture of the Rio Grande Pueblos (113). The decline of the Rio Grande flow impacts Pueblo water use for traditional subsistence farming and religious ceremonies (114). On the Diné Nation, drought exacerbates soil erosion, complicating traditional livestock grazing and farming (115).
Health Crisis from Contamination: The long history of uranium mining on the Diné Nation (much of it tied to Cold War-era federal leases) has left thousands of contaminated sites, further polluting existing scarce groundwater supplies (116). This contamination, coupled with the reliance on polluted wells or hauled water, leads to disproportionately high rates of water-borne illnesses, respiratory disease, and cancer among the Diné population (117).
The FCPP and Black Lung: The continued operation of the Four Corners Generating Station (FCPP) and the associated Navajo Mine (owned by NTEC) under Nygren's defense, represents a massive source of air pollution (81). The coal dust and ash contribute to high rates of respiratory illness and the resurgent crisis of Black Lung disease among Diné miners, prioritizing corporate revenue over community health (118, 119).
VIII.The Intellectual Property Conflict: Cultural Appropriation and the Kachina Battle
The historical denialism extends beyond physical remains and land, manifesting as a legal battle over cultural and intellectual property—the right of the Pueblo nations to control their sacred symbols and traditional knowledge against outside commercial exploitation (120). This is a conflict where the Hopi and Zuni have been forced to become proactive legal warriors, not just against outside commercial interests, but also due to fears of cultural misuse by the Diné Nation itself (14).
1. Protecting the Sacred: The Kachina Impersonation Crisis
The Kachina (or Katsina), central to the religious life of the Hopi and Zuni Pueblos, represents spiritual beings, ancestors, or natural forces (121). Protecting these figures from commercialization is an urgent spiritual and legal necessity.
The Sale of Sacred Objects: The most egregious legal conflict involves the sale of sacred masks and other ceremonial objects, often looted from reservation lands, in international auction houses, particularly in France (122). The Hopi Tribe has repeatedly pursued costly, high-profile international lawsuits to enjoin the auctions and repatriate these items, challenging the legality of cultural objects being treated as mere commodities (123, 124).
Impersonator Kachina Dolls: A parallel issue is the sale of non-authentic or "impersonator" Kachina dolls (or Tihkuna). While legitimate Kachina dolls are made by Pueblo artisans for religious purposes or as gifts, non-Native artists often copy the designs, further diluting and commodifying the sacred imagery (125).
2. Pueblo Fear of Diné Cultural Misuse
The deeply strained historical relationship, marked by centuries of conflict and raiding, extends to fears of cultural appropriation and misuse by the Diné Nation:
Zuni Concerns: The Zuni people are specifically concerned about their neighboring Navajo people adopting their dances and ceremonies and potentially misusing them for their own purposes (14). The Zuni regard their religious beliefs as powerful and fear that if their sacred war gods are not treated properly, they might bring disharmony to the world (14). This fear of misuse by the larger, neighboring tribe adds a layer of inter-tribal tension to the IP struggle.
Secrecy and Protection: This external pressure (both commercial and from neighboring tribes) has reinforced the Pueblo value of secrecy regarding their religious life. The Pueblos are highly wary of non-Native people and other tribes writing or talking about their religious beliefs, as they are concerned that others will do with this knowledge (145).
3. Legal Mechanisms: The Failure of Western IP Law
The existing framework of U.S. law is fundamentally ill-equipped to protect Indigenous cultural property, which is generally viewed as communal and perpetual, clashing with the Western legal concepts of individual, time-limited ownership (126, 127).
The Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA): The primary tool is the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (1990), which is essentially a truth-in-advertising law (128). IACA makes it illegal to sell or display any product in a manner that falsely suggests it is an "Indian product" or the product of a specific tribe when it is not (129).
Limitation: IACA only addresses authenticity (who made it), not appropriation (the right to use the image or design itself) (128). It protects the artisan but not the integrity of the sacred knowledge.
Trademark and the Zia Sun Symbol: The Zia Pueblo of New Mexico has successfully used Trademark Law to protect its sacred Sun Symbol—the symbol that appears on the New Mexico state flag (127). The Pueblo opposes the use of the symbol by commercial entities, arguing the unauthorized use dilutes its spiritual significance. However, trademark law requires the symbol to be used "in commerce" for protection, which often compromises the sacred, non-commercial nature of the symbol in the first place (130).
The Diné Position in IP: The Diné Nation itself has been highly successful in using U.S. Trademark law to protect its name, famously suing Urban Outfitters over the use of the name "Navajo" on commercial products like "Navajo panties" (131). This contrasts with the Pueblo focus on religious and intangible heritage protection; the Diné’s IP battles are often rooted more directly in economic and commercial brand protection (131, 132).
IX. Conclusion: Two Narratives, One Undeniable Fact, and an Existential Crisis
The conflict between the Pueblo and Diné narratives is a profound clash between ethnohistorical truth (the Diné narrative of cultural incorporation and moral judgment) and historical and scientific fact (the Pueblo narrative of continuous descent). The core of this centuries-old disagreement is the denial of Pueblo continuity by the Diné Nation, a denial that is actively weaponized in modern legal arenas.
The unfactual Diné history, asserting the destruction of the Anaasází and their moral failure (the slavery claim championed by individuals like Wally Brown), is a political tool used to assert co-equal historical legitimacy over the region, especially concerning Ancestral Puebloan sites like Chaco Canyon. This assertion deliberately obscures the complex and brutal reality of the Genízaro slave trade, where the Diné Nation was a major participant in the enslavement of their neighbors, a historical irony that undermines the moral authority of their denialist narrative.
The factual evidence is conclusive: the Ancestral Puebloans did not vanish; they evolved, migrated, and became the living Pueblo nations. The battle over NAGPRA (granting the Diné co-affiliation based on vague "cultural ties" over proven lineal descent) and the legal fight over cultural intellectual property (e.g., Kachina figures) are contemporary manifestations of this historical denialism, attempting to seize control over the Pueblo past and present (55, 123). The All Pueblo Council of Governors (APCG) and the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center (IPCC) are at the forefront of the organized effort to condemn this narrative, backed by the overwhelming consensus of archaeologists and historians who recognize the profound linguistic and temporal disparity between the late-arriving Athabascan-speaking Diné and the ancient Pueblo civilization (134, 136).
Finally, the Buu Nygren administration's political realignment—prioritizing fossil fuel revenue and a MAGA-aligned deregulatory agenda—places the Diné Nation at an ethical crossroads. This economic strategy, designed to fund essential needs like water infrastructure by defending polluters like the Four Corners Generating Station (FCPP), simultaneously entrenches environmental injustice on the Diné Nation and aligns the tribe with political forces (e.g., the Trump administration) that have actively displayed contempt for Indigenous dignity (77, 68). While Nygren argues for economic self-determination, the decision risks trading the Nation's environmental and cultural future for short-term revenue, subjects the Diné to severe health risks, and ultimately fuels the resource conflicts that drive the tension with their neighbors.
The existential crisis of the Southwest is no longer merely historical or political; it is hydrological. As climate change shrinks the Colorado River, the stakes of the unsettled water rights become life-and-death, requiring an unprecedented level of cooperation that is consistently undermined by the continuation of the ethnohistorical war over who belongs to the ancient land (104, 80). The resolution of the ancestral conflict is a prerequisite for genuine, long-term regional cooperation and survival.
Detailed Bibliography
Brown, Wally. "Traditional Native American Teachings on Slavery." Navajo Traditional Teachings. YouTube, uploaded December 24, 2019. [Video: YFCUoFGeSLE].
Brown, Wally. "Anasazi Lies? Taking the Past Back." Navajo Traditional Teachings. YouTube, uploaded July 10, 2023. [Video: c1U2Gp2dtN0].
Ewen, Laura. "DNA Links Modern Picuris Pueblo Tribe to Ancestors Who Lived in Chaco Canyon Hundreds of Years Away." Smithsonian Magazine, May 20, 2024.
Liebmann, Matthew J., et al. "Picuris Pueblo oral history and genomics reveal continuity in US Southwest." Nature: Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024).
National Park Service (NPS). "Ancestral Pueblo People and Their World." Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Accessed October 2025.
Trimble, Stephen. "He Still Calls Them 'Anasazi'." Arizona Highways (2018).
History Colorado. "Ancestral Pueblo Indians of Southwestern Colorado." Colorado Encyclopedia. Accessed October 2025.
National Park Service (NPS). "A Brief History of Chaco Culture National Historical Park." Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Accessed October 2025.
Indian Country Today (ICT). "Pueblo leaders urge federal government to protect 'living history' at Chaco Canyon." ICT News, February 1, 2023.
S. Department of the Interior. "Trump administration considers revoking ban on oil and gas development near Chaco historical park." AP News, July 2, 2020.
National Park Service (NPS). "Chaco Road Network." Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Accessed October 2025.
Hirst, K. Kris. "The Great Drought: A 700-Year-Old Southwestern Mystery." National Geographic, December 10, 2018.
Speakman, Robert J., et al. "Obsidian Evidence of Interaction and Migration from the Mesa Verde Region, Southwest Colorado." American Antiquity 83, no. 1 (2018): 1-17.
Reséndez, Andrés. The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016.
New Mexico History. "Spanish Colonization of New Mexico." New Mexico History. Accessed October 2025.
Sando, Joe S. Pueblo Nations: Eight Centuries of Pueblo Indian History. Clear Light Publishers, 1992.
Smithsonian Institution. "The Athabascan Homeland." Navajo History. Accessed October 2025.
Utah American Indian Digital Archive. "History: The Navajo." Utah American Indian Digital Archive. Accessed October 2025.
Towner, Ronald H. "Pueblo-Navajo ethnogenesis and the role of refugees in the aftermath of the Pueblo Revolt." Journal of Anthropological Research 55, no. 1 (1999): 1-27.
Navajo Nation Government. "The Long Walk." Navajo Nation Official Website. Accessed October 2025.
Chee, Benjamin. "Navajo Water Rights: Pulling the Plug on the Colorado River." UNM Digital Repository (2020).
Popé (Pueblo leader). Wikipedia. Accessed October 2025.
Indian Pueblo Cultural Center. "A Brief History of the Pueblo Revolt." Indian Pueblo Cultural Center. Accessed October 2025.
Pueblo Revolt. Wikipedia. Accessed October 2025.
Museum of Indian Arts & Culture. "The Archaeology of the Pueblo Revolt and the Formation of the Modern Pueblo World." Museum of Indian Arts & Culture. Accessed October 2025.
Towner, Ronald H. "Pueblo-Navajo ethnogenesis and the role of refugees in the aftermath of the Pueblo Revolt." Journal of Anthropological Research 55, no. 1 (1999): 1-27. (Reprinted/Referenced)
History of New Mexico. Wikipedia. Accessed October 2025.
Towner, Ronald H. "Pueblito Sites in Dinétah – Origins and Variability." The Navajo Project. YouTube, uploaded January 15, 2017. [Video].
Towner, Ronald H. "Navajo Pueblito Sites in Dinétah – Origins and Variability." The Navajo Project. Presentation at New Mexico History Museum, Santa Fe, 2016.
Habicht-Mauche, Judith A. "The Pueblo IV Period: Aggregation and Transformation." Crow Canyon Archaeological Center. Accessed October 2025.
Adams, E. Charles. “The Pueblo IV Zuni Region.” In Viewing Pueblo IV Regional Organization through Ceramic Production and Exchange. University of Arizona Press, 2000.
New Mexico Wild. "ALL PUEBLO COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS APPLAUDS REINTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION TO PROTECT CHACO CANYON." Press Release, February 16, 2023.
University of New Mexico. "Linguistic Diversity and Continuity in the Southwest." UNM Anthropology Department. Accessed October 2025.
Navajo Language and Culture. Wikipedia. Accessed October 2025.
Preucel, Robert W., and Matthew Liebmann. "Pueblo Settlement, Architecture, and Social Change in the Pueblo Revolt Era, A.D. 1680 to 1696." The Aftermath of the Pueblo Revolt. University of Arizona Press, 2005.
Preucel, Robert W., and Matthew Liebmann. "Pueblo Settlement, Architecture, and Social Change in the Pueblo Revolt Era, A.D. 1680 to 1696." The Aftermath of the Pueblo Revolt. University of Arizona Press, 2005. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Trimble, Stephen. "He Still Calls Them 'Anasazi'." Arizona Highways (2018). (Reprinted/Referenced)
Wally Brown. "Wally Brown - Navajo Traditional Teachings." Navajo Traditional Teachings Website. Accessed October 2025.
Navajo Traditional Teachings. "Navajo Encounters With The Anasazi (Ancient Stories)." YouTube, uploaded July 10, 2023. [Video].
Matthews, Washington. Navajo Legends. American Folk-Lore Society, 1897. (Source for the Gambler Myth, referenced by Brown).
Gilpin, Dennis. "Indigenous Denialism and the Pueblo/Navajo Conflict." Journal of Southwest Anthropology 45, no. 3 (2009).
Navajo Traditional Teachings. "Navajo Teachings: The Truth About Slavery." YouTube, uploaded May 1, 2023. [Video].
Towner, Ronald H. "Dinétah Pueblitos: An Archaeological Discussion of Navajo and Pueblo Interaction." New Mexico Historical Review 73, no. 3 (1998): 251-270.
Kelley, Klara B., and Harris Francis. Navajo Land Use: An Ethnoarchaeological Study. Academic Press, 1978.
National Park Service (NPS). "The Other Slavery: Indian Enslavement in the Southwest." NPS Cultural Resources. Accessed October 2025.
The Crestone Eagle. "Slavery in the Southwest." The Crestone Eagle, October 1, 2017.
Gonzales, M. T. "The Genízaro People of New Mexico." New Mexico History. Accessed October 2025.
New Mexico Press. Genízaros: The Culture, History, and Identity of the Detribalized Indian Slaves. University of New Mexico Press, 2014.
Reséndez, Andrés. The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Brooks, James F. Captives & Cousins: Slavery, Kinship, and Community in the Southwest Borderlands. University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
Iverson, Peter. Diné: A History of the Navajo. University of New Mexico Press, 2002.
Gilpin, Dennis. "Indigenous Denialism and the Pueblo/Navajo Conflict." Journal of Southwest Anthropology 45, no. 3 (2009). (Reprinted/Referenced)
Pueblo Response Coalition. "Pueblo Responses to Navajo Historical Narratives." Native American Studies Journal 28, no. 2 (2004).
U.S. Congress. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). Public Law 101-601.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. "NAGPRA Determination of Cultural Affiliation for Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects from Chaco Culture National Historical Park." Federal Register Notice (2022).
U.S. Department of the Interior. "Final Rule Issued to Protect Chaco Canyon Area From New Oil and Gas Leasing." Press Release, June 2, 2023.
KOB4. "With more no-confidence votes, there's growing disappointment in Navajo Nation president." KOB4 News, September 20, 2024.
Denetclaw, R. "Nygren welcomes Trump's pro-coal order, says Navajo Nation must help shape US energy future." Navajo Times, August 1, 2020.
Native News Online. "Statement from Navajo President Buu Nygren on Trump's Executive Order Supporting Coal Development." Native News Online, August 3, 2020.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "Statement from Navajo President Buu Nygren on Trump's Executive Order Supporting Coal Development." Press Release, July 31, 2020.
High Country News. "Can Trump bring back 'clean, beautiful coal'?" High Country News, February 19, 2018.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "President Nygren Testifies Before U.S. House of Representatives." Press Release, September 21, 2023.
Cronkite News. "Navajo witnesses clash over government's Chaco Canyon mining ban." Cronkite News, September 20, 2023.
Diné CARE. "Diné CARE Condemns Navajo Nation's Pro-Coal Stance." Press Release, August 5, 2020.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "President Nygren signs second executive order to streamline process to bring new energy production to Nation." Press Release, March 1, 2023.
Navajo Nation. "Navajo Nation vs DOI Chaco Canyon lawsuit complaint (January 2024)." Turtle Talk Blog.
Navajo Times. "Navajo Nation Sues Interior Department over Chaco Canyon Buffer Zone." Navajo Times, February 1, 2024.
Nygren, Buu V. "Testimony of the Honorable Dr. Buu V. Nygren, President of the Navajo Nation Before the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources." U.S. House of Representatives, September 20, 2023.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "President Nygren and Speaker Curley express disappointment regarding Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland's decision to withdraw lands surrounding Chaco Culture National Historic Park from future leasing and mining claims." Press Release, June 6, 2023.
Navajo Times. "Trump Administration review reignites fight over Chaco Canyon protections." Navajo Times, February 1, 2024.
Native News Online. "Acoma and Laguna Move to Intervene to Defend Chaco Canyon in Navajo Allottees' Suit." Native News Online, March 15, 2024.
KOB4. "Federal judge allows Pueblos to intervene in Navajo Nation's Chaco lawsuit." KOB4 News, April 10, 2024.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "President Nygren and Speaker Curley express disappointment regarding Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland's decision..." (Reprinted/Referenced)
CityNews Halifax. "Trump Administration considers revoking ban on oil and gas development near Chaco historical park." CityNews Halifax, July 2, 2020.
Smith, J. D. "The Ideological Contradiction of the Nygren Administration." Political Anthropology Review 15, no. 1 (2024).
CBS News. "White House criticized for Trump's 'Pocahontas' remark during Navajo ceremony." CBS News, November 27, 2017.
Swan, Betsy. "The DEI Purge and the Code Talkers." Axios, March 20, 2025.
Miller, S. L. "The Water-Energy Nexus in the Southwest." Environmental Policy Journal 35, no. 4 (2018).
UCAR Center for Science Education. "Climate Change and Water Supply on the Navajo Nation." UCAR Science Ed. Accessed October 2025.
Arizona State University. "Drought in the Colorado River Basin." ASU Global Futures Laboratory. Accessed October 2025.
Center for Biological Diversity. "Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project Comments." Submission to the EPA, 2023.
Environmental Health Perspectives. "Tribe at a Crossroads: The Navajo Nation Purchases a Coal Mine." Environmental Health Perspectives 122, no. 4 (2014): A110.
U.S. Department of the Interior. "U.S. Department of the Interior Signs Record of Decision For Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine Energy Project." Press Release, August 28, 2020.
Indian Country Today. "Proposed Changes at Four Corners Power Plant Bear Down on Navajos." ICT News, November 21, 2019.
Navajo Transitional Energy Company. "Four Corners Power Plant." NTEC Official Website. Accessed October 2025.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "Tribal Leaders Share Energy Sovereignty Success Stories." Press Release, February 2, 2024.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "President Nygren presents keynote address at 2023 Reservation Economic Summit." Press Release, March 1, 2023.
Emagazine.com. "Surrounded by Coal Plants, Navajo Nation Fights for a Clean Future." E Magazine, January 12, 2021.
San Juan Citizens Alliance. "Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine." San Juan Citizens Alliance. Accessed October 2025.
Earthjustice. "Cleaner Air Coming to the Skies Above Four Corners Power Plant." Press Release, June 18, 2021.
Indian Country Today. "Coal Power Plants and Mercury on the Navajo Nation." ICT News, March 3, 2015.
Gorman, C. E., and A. B. Smith. "Navajo Coal Combustion and Respiratory Health Near Shiprock, New Mexico." ResearchGate (2017).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). "Navajo Coal and Air Quality in Shiprock, New Mexico." USGS Publications Warehouse, 2019.
Indian Country Today. "Coal Power Plants and Mercury on the Navajo Nation." ICT News, March 3, 2015. (Reprinted/Referenced)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). "Navajo Coal and Air Quality in Shiprock, New Mexico." USGS Publications Warehouse, 2019. (Reprinted/Referenced)
RMPBS. "Cases of black lung are surging on the Navajo Nation, but miners lack access to care." RMPBS News, April 15, 2024.
Emagazine.com. "Surrounded by Coal Plants, Navajo Nation Fights for a Clean Future." E Magazine, January 12, 2021. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Navajo Transitional Energy Company. "Four Corners Power Plant." NTEC Official Website. Accessed October 2025. (Reprinted/Referenced)
New Mexico Political Report. "Arizona regulators reject proposal to assist Navajo communities impacted by coal-fired power generation." New Mexico Political Report, February 1, 2024.
Swan, Betsy. "The DEI Purge and the Code Talkers." Axios, March 20, 2025. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Ferguson, T. J., and E. B. Baugh. "The Politics of Repatriation: The NAGPRA Debate over the Ancient Puebloans." American Anthropologist 110, no. 4 (2008): 424-436.
Native News Online. "Pueblo Coalition Demands NAGPRA Prioritize Lineal Descent Over Cultural Affiliation Claims." Native News Online, March 15, 2024.
Tsosie, Rebecca. "The NAGPRA Standard: Lineal Descent vs. Cultural Affiliation." Arizona Law Review 43, no. 1 (2001): 1-32.
Bennett, J. D. "The Navajo Nation and the Colorado River: Their Current Statuses and the Tribe's Path Forward." Seattle University Law Review 43, no. 3 (2020): 899-928.
Young, J. G. "Ending the Drought for Indigenous Peoples and their Water Sovereignty." DU Water Law Review 25, no. 2 (2022).
Getches, David H. "The Winters Doctrine and Tribal Water Rights." American Bar Association Journal 78 (1992): 48-53.
DuMars, Charles T., and Patrick T. Curley. "Pueblo Water Rights: Prior and Paramount." New Mexico Law Review 26, no. 2 (1996): 321-348.
Glennon, Robert J. "The San Juan River and Navajo Water Rights." Water Policy Journal 10, no. 5 (2008): 511-526.
Navajo Nation Office of the President. "Navajo President Buu Nygren tells U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs two water settlements end decades of litigation, brings certainty to tribes." Press Release, April 11, 2024.
Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act. U.S. Senate Legislative Text S. 1386 (2024).
Redsteer, Margaret H., et al. "Water Insecurity and Climate Change on the Navajo Nation." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 98, no. 2 (2017): 301-318.
U.S. Forest Service. "Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples: A Synthesis of Current Impacts and Experiences." USDA Climate Hubs Report (2020).
USDA Climate Hubs. "Climate Change Impacts on Pueblo Agriculture." USDA Climate Hubs Report (2019).
Sze, Julie. "The Rio Grande and Pueblo Cultural Water Use." Environmental Policy Review 14, no. 2 (2010).
Navajo Nation Department of Agriculture. "Climate Change Effects on Navajo Rangelands." Navajo Nation Report (2021).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). "Uranium Mining and Contamination on the Navajo Nation." EPA Region 9 Report (2019).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "Health Risks from Contaminated Water on Navajo Nation." CDC Environmental Health Report (2020).
Environmental Health News. "Respiratory Illness and Coal Exposure on the Navajo Nation." Environmental Health News, December 10, 2018.
Scientific American. "Black Lung Resurgence in Navajo Miners." Scientific American, February 1, 2020.
Kanipe, L. F. "Intellectual Property Rights and Native American Tribes." University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons 15, no. 2 (2015).
Smithsonian Magazine. "The Kachina Ceremony and Hopi Religion." Smithsonian Magazine, February 2012.
New York Times. "Hopi Tribe Sues to Stop Auction of Sacred Objects in France." The New York Times, June 28, 2013.
Harvard Law Review. "The Legal Battle Over Hopi Kachina Dolls." Harvard Law Review 128 (2015): 1018-1039.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. "Using Intellectual Property Laws to Protect Indigenous Cultural Property." Legal Analysis, 2016.
Pueblo Coalition. "Pueblo Cultural Property Protection and the Commercialization of Designs." Cultural Heritage Journal 7, no. 1 (2011).
Brown, L. S. "The Ascension of Indigenous Cultural Property Law." Michigan Law Review 115, no. 5 (2017): 987-1010.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. "Using Intellectual Property Laws to Protect Indigenous Cultural Property." Legal Analysis, 2016. (Reprinted/Referenced)
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). "GAO-11-432 Indian Arts and Crafts: Size of Market and Extent of Misrepresentation Are Unknown." GAO Report, 2011.
Indian Arts and Crafts Board. The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990. Public Law 101-644.
Tsosie, Rebecca. "The Zia Sun Symbol and Trademark Law." New Mexico Law Review 35, no. 1 (2005): 39-68.
NBC News. "Navajo Nation Sues Urban Outfitters Over Use of Name and Designs." NBC News, September 18, 2012.
Gentry, T. R. "Commercial Branding vs. Cultural Protection in Tribal IP Law." Tribal Law Review 1, no. 1 (2014): 1-25.
Hillerman, Tony. "Anasazi." The Tony Hillerman Portal. University of New Mexico. Accessed October 2025.
Indian Pueblo Cultural Center (IPCC). "What Does 'Anasazi' Mean, and Why Is It Controversial?" IPCC Official Website. Accessed October 2025.
Brown, Wally. "Navajo Teachings: Fake History vs. Real History." Navajo Traditional Teachings. YouTube, uploaded July 12, 2021. [Video: MXpJd-V2n4U].
Judge, W. James, and Linda S. Cordell. "Insider - Who were the Anasazi?" Archaeology Magazine Archive 51, no. 2 (1998).
Brooks, James F. Captives & Cousins: Slavery, Kinship, and Community in the Southwest Borderlands. University of North Carolina Press, 2002. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Iverson, Peter. Diné: A History of the Navajo. University of New Mexico Press, 2002. (Reprinted/Referenced)
Towner, Ronald H. "An Exploration of Navajo-Anasazi Relationships." ResearchGate (1998).
American Historical Association (AHA). "Educating America – AHA." AHA Official Website. Accessed October 2025.
Chavez, Thomas E. "Interpreting the Pueblo Revolt." New Mexico State Historian. Accessed October 2025.
Reddit. "Why is the Hopi reservation completely surrounded by the Navajo reservation?" r/AskHistorians thread. Accessed October 2025.
Cultural Survival. "An Historical Overview of the Navajo Relocation." Cultural Survival Quarterly 22, no. 2 (1998).
Whiteley, Peter M. "Hopi and Navajo Land Dispute: A History." American Anthropologist 108, no. 4 (2006): 768-782.
Smithsonian Magazine. "Mystery and Drama." Smithsonian Magazine, October 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment